Liberal Democracy Crashing Worldwide

..4ROM and brought 2U by MONKEYS ex Community Economist Publications Worldwide 1996 through to 2003 when the writer quit for a bit as he realised and wrote and published that we were all headed for a fossil-fuels burning business-as-usual heating ‘bio-meltdown’ by 2032

@wired4weld as accessible to a readership (downloadable presumably – I think – do I care, No-nein-нет) and published that is to suggest uploaded per my super-cheap Ruslan Kogan ‘Vodie=vibes’ – Australian comedy, baby-talk and dad jokes no we don’t normally do Australian comedy, poo jokes and stuff people at the Bloo-ie E/ p’s Broad & Bloke Casting Corporation get paid $120 thousand a year to pump out – TOTALLY Richard Branson-free thankfully greeneconomyaction.com – if you like the Pentagon and the evil mediaeval Central Intellgence Agency only ever read what you want to read for your perverted prurient vacuous pleasure then we really do have news for you.

“AI analysed 1,500 policies to cut emissions.”

Izzuhnt AI extraordinarily useful to Man\ What a piece of work is man/ how noble in his execution of the most complex sensorimotor tasks anyone ever dreamed of or saw a @YouTube video a @TedTalk or heard about team.

” Only 63 climate change interventions led to significant reductions in carbon emissions.. Xiaoying You “

Smoke and steam bellows from the chimneys and cooling towers of Ratcliffe-on-Soar coal fired power station in England. — Taxes were particularly effective at reducing emissions associated with electricity generation in high-income countries.Credit: Andrew Aitchison/In pictures via Getty

“Researchers used machine learning to analyse roughly 1,500 climate policies and identify those that have dramatically reduced carbon emissions. Their study, published in Science today, found that policies that combine several tools are more effective in slashing emissions than are stand-alone measures¹.

“The analysis identified 63 interventions in 35 countries that led to significant reductions in emissions, cutting them by 19% on average. Most reductions were linked to two or more policies. Together, the 63 policies cut emissions by between 0.6 and 1.8 gigatonnes (Gt) of CO₂ equivalent.What’s the best way to tackle climate change? An ‘evidence bank’ could help scientists find answers

“Using the right mix of policies is more important than using a lot of policies, says Annika Stechemesser, a co-author and researcher at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. For example, the UK’s phasing out of coal-fired power stations worked because it was used in tandem with pricing mechanisms, such as a minimum carbon price, while in Norway, banning combustion engine cars was most effective when combined with a price incentive that made electric cars cheaper.

“To my knowledge, it is a first-of-its-kind study providing such a global evaluation,” says Jan Minx, an environmental economist with the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change in Berlin.

Road to reductions

As part of the analysis, Stechemesser and her colleagues used a database of 1,500 climate policies implemented between 1998 and 2022 in 41 countries, including the top three greenhouse gas emitters globally: China, the United States and India. The policies fell into 48 categories, ranging from emission trading schemes to fossil-fuel subsidy reforms.

“Previous evaluations have typically concentrated on a narrow set of prominent policies in selected countries, overlooking the hundreds of other measures,” Stechemesser says.

“The authors combined machine learning with a statistical analytical approach to identify large emission reductions in four high-emitting sectors — buildings, electricity, industry and transport. They compared the results with policies in the database to assess which policies and policy combinations led to the biggest emission drops.

“This is a rather clever method,” says Zheng Saina, who has analysed global climate policies at Southeast University in Nanjing, China. The conventional way would have been to review the large number of policies and select the important ones, but that approach is subjective and cumbersome, she adds. “The authors instead used machine learning to detect major emissions changes. It is more objective.”

Right mix

The results showed that certain policy combinations worked better in specific sectors and economies. In terms of reducing emissions associated with electricity generation, for instance, pricing interventions such as energy taxes were particularly effective in high-income countries, but less so in lower-and-middle income countries.

In the building sector, policy mixes that included phased out and banned emissions-generating activities more than doubled the reductions resulting from implementing those policies individually.

“Taxation was the only policy that achieved nearly equal or larger emission reductions as a stand-alone policy, as opposed to a policy mix, in all four sectors.

“Minx says the study’s AI-enhanced approach allowed the researchers, for the first time, to evaluate the effectiveness of a large number of climate policies from a global set of emission inventories covering different countries and sectors.

“For other researchers, the paper is alarming. “This study provides a warning to countries around the world that their climate policies have had very limited effects so far,” says Xu Chi, an ecologist at Nanjing University. “Existing polices will need to be re-evaluated, and changes will need to be made,” Xu adds.

“The world’s annual emissions are projected to be 15 Gt of CO₂ equivalents higher by 2030 than would be required to keep global warming to less than 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, according to the United Nations.

” doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02717-7