
For a year now Mr Simons has courageously, indefatigably and in the face of commonly foolish complaint advanced the public facts about sulphide aerosols IN RELATION TO pre-apocalyptic heat forcings from the North Atlantic ocean.
Searching for some intelligent human speech or text on Gaia and the magnificent and inspirational NON rhetorician and non nonscience fraud James Lovelock deceased 2022 I basically find a rant about some ancient committee calling itself Scientists for Nuclear Energy and am left bereft with the 1970s private schoolboy assertion that the earth was not at all a multi-systems virtual or quasi living entity but a mega bigly bunch of politically correctly (not to frighten ailing folk, the neurocognitively-challenged rich people, deter overseas tourism or upset the billionaire cabal gentlemen) HYPOTHESISED electromechanical shitbox crying out as it were for boiling up in cauldrons, pickling, dessicating, placing in glass cases and supposedly – remember, young people, in your anthropoverse, literary, musical & generally artistic flair are the money (automatically regenerating – just like toxic sythetic chemicals free organic food production so-o-o good 4 plan it end peeple – βAIβ and Dalle 3 whizzo with vast galaxy-gulping stored electrical energy aka βdataβ for example) Charging the People a Dollar & a Half Just to See βem.y
ππ½ Your keys to success in business, supply side economy AND household bliss
I also find the following per courtesia @Wikipedia..
CLAW hypothesis
The CLAW hypothesis proposes a negative feedback loop that operates between ocean ecosystemsand the Earth’s climate.[1] The hypothesis specifically proposes that particular phytoplankton that produce dimethyl sulfide are responsive to variations in climate forcing, and that these responses act to stabilise the temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere. The CLAW hypothesis was originally proposed by Robert Jay Charlson, James Lovelock, Meinrat Andreae and Stephen G. Warren, and takes its acronym from the first letter of their surnames.[2]
Anti-CLAW hypothesis
In his 2006 book The Revenge of Gaia, Lovelock proposed that instead of providing negative feedback in the climate system, the components of the CLAW hypothesis may act to create a positive feedback loop.[3]
Under future global warming, increasing temperature may stratify the world ocean, decreasing the supply of nutrients from the deep ocean to its productive euphotic zone. Consequently, phytoplankton activity will decline with a concomitant fall in the production of DMS. In a reverse of the CLAW hypothesis, this decline in DMS production will lead to a decrease in cloud condensation nuclei and a fall in cloud albedo. The consequence of this will be further climate warming which may lead to even less DMS production (and further climate warming). The figure to the right shows a summarising schematic diagram.
Evidence for the anti-CLAW hypothesis is constrained by similar uncertainties as those of the sulfur cycle feedback loop of the CLAW hypothesis.
However, researchers simulating future oceanic primary production have found evidence of declining production with increasing ocean stratification,[9][10] leaving open the possibility that such a mechanism may exist.
John Blundell
β’ Post Socratic expressly 2-5 set Quantum-relations Logic
β’ Fact-object-person-location-meaning-plan neurolinguistics/ accurate human communication & the new order in 25,000 universities
β’ Adelaide Hills of Sth Australia 4th August 2024
