• Patriarchic¹ Pre-fascist Rewards Consumerism goes to Societal Collapse

• Family and Society: Beyond Max Weber and Into Our Futures What’s Left of Them

The following is excerpted from a Wikipedia entry last modified at that moment in “His Story” by “Me, Myself, and I are Here” on 13/12/23..

“ Social comparison theory and cognitive dissonance have been described by other psychologists as “the two most fruitful theories in social psychology.”^[62] Cognitive dissonance has been variously described as “social psychology’s most notable achievement,”^[63] “the most important development in social psychology to date,”^[64] and a theory without which “social psychology would not be what it is today.”^[65] Cognitive dissonance spawned decades of related research, from studies focused on further theoretical refinement and development^[66] to domains as varied as decision making, the socialization of children, and color preference.^[67]

“ In addition, Festinger is credited with the ascendancy of laboratory experimentation in social psychology as one who “converted the experiment into a powerful scientific instrument with a central role in the search for knowledge.”^[68]An obituary published by the American Psychologist stated that it was “doubtful that experimental psychology would exist at all” without Festinger.^[69] Yet it seems that Festinger was wary about burdensome demands for greater empirical precision. Warning against the dangers of such demands when theoretical concepts are not yet fully developed, Festinger stated, “Research can increasingly address itself to minor unclarities in prior research rather than to larger issues; people can lose sight of the basic problems because the field becomes defined by the ongoing research.”^[70] He also stressed that laboratory experimentation “cannot exist by itself,” but that “there should be an active interrelation between laboratory experimentation and the study of real-life situations.”^[71] Also, while Festinger is praised for his theoretical rigor and experimental approach to social psychology, he is regarded as having contributed to “the estrangement between basic and applied social psychology in the United States.”^[72] He “became a symbol of the tough-minded, theory-oriented, pure experimental scientist,” while Ron Lippitt, a fellow faculty member at Lewin’s Research Center for Group Dynamics with whom Festinger often clashed, “became a symbol of the fuzzy-minded, do-gooder, practitioner of applied social psychology.”^[73]

“ One of the greatest impacts of Festinger’s studies lies in their “depict[ion] of social behavior as the responses of a thinking organism continually acting to bring order into his world, rather than as the blind impulses of a creature of emotion and habit,” as cited in his Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award.^[74] Behaviorism, which had dominated psychology until that time, characterized man as a creature of habit conditioned by stimulus-response reinforcement processes. Behaviorists focused only on the observable, i.e., behavior and external rewards, with no reference to cognitive or emotional processes.^[75] Theories like cognitive dissonance could not be explained in behaviorist terms. For example, liking was simply a function of reward according to behaviorism, so greater reward would produce greater liking; Festinger and Carlsmith’s experiment clearly demonstrated greater liking with lower reward, a result that required the acknowledgement of cognitive processes.^[76] With Festinger’s theories and the research that they generated, “the monolithic grip that reinforcement theory had held on social psychology was effectively and permanently broken.”^{[77] ”}

We thank you for your kind attention and good offices as you, your friends and indeed all of us get to grips at a proverbial 30 seconds to midnight with a world that tried to run itself on ludicrous barbaric religious slogans, proverbs and rhetoric but may only succeed in destroying itself.

John Blundell

The new new maths, the new neurolinguistics, human health, energy & weather systems, philosophy of science

Australia

¹ Patriarchic – meaning not of any family’s male ancestors but of all of a society’s political, cultural & legal powers being crafted, shaped, manipulated and perpetuated by rich old men and transferred to rich younger men – is the critical adjective in my Community Economist newsletter terms ACUP, ECUP & HCUP of 1996 precisely germane to the South Australian Police assault on my life and property at that very moment of history. These sociological functions and political operations by men (not to be trite but to be necessarily explicative in a world of men so inured to societal chaos, devastation and killing that they refuse to listen, have “no ears” and will not let up until politically quashed or extirpated) were artificial compartmentalisation, excessive codification and human commodification under patriarchic fiscal elites.